I believe in celebrating failure, redefining it as a positive, seeing failure as a sign of progress. Apparently, Scott Westcott at the National Federation of Independent Businesses agrees, at least a little. His article, The Fruits of Failure, explores some examples, and encourages giving failure awards, and I applaud him for researching and writing it.
Unfortunately, Westcott comes off as timid. Tom Watson’s admonition to double your rate of failure to achieve success worries him:
While doubling a failure rate could doom many small businesses, allowing for some strategic failures could end up boosting your business and employee morale.
I think Westcott is wrong on this point. Doubling the failure rate does not spell doom. Doubling the failure rate means doubling the activity rate for innovation. Unless there is something fundamentally wrong, that means doubling the success rate, too.
Rural entrepreneurs can’t afford to be timid. The enemy of small town businesses isn’t failure; it’s stagnation.
small biz rural entrepreneurship failure success
New to SmallBizSurvival.com? Take the Guided Tour. Like what you see? Subscribe.
- How small town businesses can market to remote workers and turn them into new customers - May 15, 2023
- Survey of Rural Challenges 2023 results - May 8, 2023
- Rural and small town ideas from the OU Placemaking Conference IQC 2023 - April 5, 2023
- Rural tourism trends say small towns are still cool - March 27, 2023
- Move Your Money and Bank Local - March 22, 2023
- Using a building as a warehouse or storage in a small town? Put up a sign - March 13, 2023
- How to get customers in the door of small town and rural retail stores - February 19, 2023
- Check your small business website for outdated pandemic changes, missing info - January 31, 2023
- Rural Tourism Trend: electric vehicle chargers can drive visitors - January 15, 2023
- 2023 trends for rural and small town businesses - December 26, 2022
Hi Becky,
I’ld like to agree with you, that doubling your failure rate would also double your sucess rate.
You are, however, making a small mistake, as a rate is (at least as I understand it) a relation between two diferent counts. In the specific case of a failure rate, I would set/expect it as a rate between total activity count and the failure count. So, doubling your failure rate would reduce your sucess rate, not double it.
However, I do agree with your idea that doubling your failure count would double your sucess count, in normal circunstancies.
I’ld go a bit further, and say that each failure should be a good reason to start again, with the aquired experience as a lighthouse.
An year ago I was terribly reluctant to create my first small bussiness, and now, shuting it, I know that in a few months I’ll start again.
The failure rate was too big in my company to let it survive, but the experience conquested too important. I know that as I failed, I learned how, and in most cases why.
themage
Mage, thanks for a very well thought out comment.
I appreciate your explanation of the difference between ‘rate’ and ‘count’. This phrase was present in Tom Watson’s original quote, or at least the version handed down through IBM’s history.
Ultimately, I think Watson’s point is do more, try more, experiment more. That leads to more failures, but also to more successes.
Your phrase “start again, with the acquired experience as a lighthouse” is terrific. That is a wonderful way of putting it. I hope many small business people will follow your example and learn from their hard-fought failures.
Thanks for taking the time to comment!