But longtime observers know, “The Google” starts and acquires lots of products (and products that were actually features) that never really catch on. Google products fail, in other words. All the time. But that’s okay. You’re not learning if you’re not failing.
Rex Hammock
New to SmallBizSurvival.com? Take the Guided Tour. Like what you see? Get our updates.
- Downtown is your town’s core: How to make your case - February 22, 2021
- Zoom Towns: attracting and supporting remote workers in rural small towns - December 10, 2020
- In an economic crisis, spend your brainpower before your dollars - November 25, 2020
- Video: How to fill empty car dealership buildings for the holidays - November 6, 2020
- How has 2020 changed the challenges rural small towns face? Tell us here - October 20, 2020
- The Idea Friendly Method to surviving a business crisis - October 6, 2020
- Join me for the Rural Renewal Symposium online Oct 13 - September 26, 2020
- Cheap placemaking idea: instant murals - September 11, 2020
- Refilling the rural business pipeline - July 7, 2020
- Huge vacant buildings: grants to renovate? - June 9, 2020
I agree, one does need to fail to succeed. At its root, I think the Google example is a good one although there are many factors to consider.
Google has the capital to fail 8 days a week, they’ll also purchase companies whose services they never intend on releasing to the public for sheer sake of clearing a new market place of competitors.
Thanks for your thoughts, Chris. This is part of our ongoing series on failure. To be a successful entrepreneur, you must be willing to face the possibility of failure. We feel like it’s terrible to fail, when actually it’s a sign of activity.